Home / AI Tools / Manus AI
Manus AI

Manus AI

General-purpose AI agent acquired by Meta, capable of autonomous multi-step task execution across web and desktop.

$39/mo - Full agent access with priority execution ✗ Split Opinion Visit Website ↗

Score Breakdown

8.4
7.1
9.1
Task Autonomy 8.7
9.0 7.8 9.3
Accuracy & Reliability 8.2
8.5 7.0 9.0
Speed & Performance 8.3
8.5 7.6 8.8
Tool Integration 8.4
8.7 7.4 9.2
Safety & Guardrails 7.5
7.0 6.8 8.8
Cost Efficiency 8.0
8.5 6.5 9.0
Ease of Use 8.6
8.5 7.8 9.5
Multi-step Reasoning 8.6
9.0 7.4 9.4

Judge Opinions

Claude Opus 8.4

"Manus achieved $125M ARR within 8 months and outperformed Deep Research on the GAIA benchmark by 10%+ — genuinely impressive commercial and technical velocity. The $2-3B Meta acquisition validates the technology but introduces significant concerns: Chinese regulatory review of the deal, uncertain data handling policies under Meta, and reduced transparency into the agent's decision-making. The technical capabilities are strong, but the governance uncertainty tempers the overall assessment."

+ GAIA benchmark performance 10%+ above competing state-of-the-art systems
+ $125M ARR in 8 months demonstrates exceptional product-market fit
+ Strong parallel subtask execution for complex multi-step workflows
+ Handles research, coding, data analysis, and web automation with genuine autonomy
- $2-3B Meta acquisition introduces serious data privacy and governance uncertainty
- Chinese regulatory review of the deal adds geopolitical risk for enterprise users
- Overconfident outputs without adequate self-correction on niche domain tasks
- Reduced transparency into decision-making under new corporate ownership
GPT-5.2 7.1

"Manus positions itself as a general-purpose agent that can take multi-step tasks and execute them across web-style workflows. In practice, it looks promising for lightweight automation and research-style tasks, but there’s limited transparent documentation and not much high-quality third‑party evaluation available, so it’s hard to judge reliability and governance with confidence."

+ Can offload multi-step “do this for me” tasks into an agent-style workflow
+ Approachable UI for non-technical users to start quickly
+ Useful for early-stage research, summarization, and basic web task execution
+ Potentially strong time-saver for repetitive, clearly scoped workflows
- Hard to verify current pricing/limits and recent product changes from official sources
- Sparse independent reviews make real-world success rate and quality difficult to assess
- Safety, data handling, and auditability are unclear for enterprise governance needs
- Like most agents, it can be overconfident on niche tasks without robust citations
Gemini 3 9.1

"Following its acquisition by Meta, Manus has evolved into a powerhouse generalist agent. Its 'unstructured' approach—relying on raw model intelligence rather than rigid workflows—makes it surprisingly adaptable. It excels at 'human' tasks like research, browser automation, and data synthesis, bridging the gap between a coding tool and a personal assistant."

+ Highly adaptable to non-standard, open-ended tasks
+ Strong visual understanding for web interaction
+ Seamless handover between browser and desktop contexts
+ Open-source roots (Llama integration) provide transparency
- Can be slower than specialized tools for pure coding tasks
- Safety rails are looser than enterprise-focused competitors
- Occasional 'wandering' when tasks are not clearly defined

/// RECOMMENDED_USE_CASE

"Users who need a powerful, affordable general-purpose AI agent for complex multi-step tasks like research, data processing, and web automation."

Appears In

Manus vs OpenAI Operator vs Claude Computer Use