Home / AI Tools / GitHub Copilot vs Amazon Q vs Cody
Updated 2026-02-08

GITHUB COPILOT VS AMAZON Q VS CODY

Enterprise-grade AI coding assistants from GitHub, AWS, and Sourcegraph compared

Claude Opus
GPT-5.2
Gemini 3
👑 AI CONSENSUS WINNER
GitHub Copilot

GitHub Copilot

AI coding platform with IDE extensions, autonomous agents, and CLI — deeply integrated into GitHub

8.8 Score
~ Moderate Agreement
8.5
8.6
9.2
Free + $10/mo
Cody

Cody

AI coding assistant by Sourcegraph

7.5 Score
Strong Consensus
7.5
7.4
7.6
Free + $9/mo
Amazon Q Developer

Amazon Q Developer

AI-powered development companion for AWS

7.3 Score
Strong Consensus
7.2
7.2
7.6
Free + $19/mo/user

/// THE_VERDICT

GitHub Copilot maintains its enterprise lead with the broadest IDE support, most refined inline completions, and an unbeatable GitHub integration story that extends from code review to pull requests. Its agent mode continues to improve, closing the gap with dedicated agentic tools. Amazon Q Developer differentiates with deep AWS service integration and security scanning capabilities, making it the natural choice for teams building on AWS infrastructure. Cody by Sourcegraph brings unique value through its code graph understanding — it indexes your entire codebase for context-aware answers, making it particularly strong for navigating large, unfamiliar codebases.

SCORE BREAKDOWN

Code Quality & Accuracy
8.8
7.5
7.4
Context Understanding
8.4
8.6
7.1
Multi-file Editing
8.0
6.9
6.6
Speed & Performance
9.1
7.1
7.7
Pricing Value
9.1
7.2
8.1
Ease of Use
9.3
7.2
7.3
Model Flexibility
8.1
7.6
5.0
Extension Ecosystem
9.7
6.8
8.7

DEEP DIVE

GitHub Copilot

GitHub Copilot

AI coding platform with IDE extensions, autonomous agents, and CLI — deeply integrated into GitHub

8.8 Score

/// JUDGE_SUMMARIES

"GitHub Copilot has evolved from a code completion extension into a multi-surface AI platform spanning IDE extensions, agent mode, an autonomous coding agent, and a CLI with sub-agents. Its deep GitHub ecosystem integration — PR reviews, issue context, Actions — creates a unified workflow no competitor matches. The $10/month Pro plan remains the best value in AI coding, though dedicated AI editors still lead on multi-file editing."

— Claude Opus 8.5

"GitHub Copilot covers inline completions, chat, and agent workflows, with optional automation that can turn issues into draft pull requests in a GitHub-centric loop. It’s easy to roll out across a team and is strongest when you want suggestions anchored to repository and PR context. The trade-offs are inconsistent performance on large refactors and feature depth that varies by plan tier."

— GPT-5.2 8.6

"GitHub Copilot in 2026 has evolved into a comprehensive AI platform. The new 'Pro+' tier (9/mo) unlocks top-tier models like Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5, addressing previous complaints about model staleness. With 'Secure MCP integrations' and ubiquitous availability (VS Code, JetBrains, Xcode, Zed), it remains the safe, default choice for enterprises, though it still feels less 'agentic' than Cursor."

— Gemini 3 9.2

/// SYSTEM_DIAGNOSTICS

+ Unbeatable price-to-value ratio at $10/month with generous free tier
+ Deepest GitHub ecosystem integration of any tool — PRs, Issues, Actions, Codespaces
+ Multi-surface: IDE extensions (VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim, Xcode), Agent Mode, Coding Agent, CLI
+ Broadest IDE support of any AI coding tool
+ Multi-model support including GPT, Claude, and Gemini
- Multi-file editing in IDE still trails dedicated AI editors
- Context window feels limited on large codebases compared to purpose-built agents
- Agent mode accuracy can be inconsistent — sometimes references non-existent APIs
- Pro+ at $39/mo needed for full model access and higher premium request limits
/// RECOMMENDED_USE_CASE

Developers and teams on GitHub who want a comprehensive AI coding platform spanning IDE, agents, and CLI at an unbeatable price

Cody

Cody

AI coding assistant by Sourcegraph

7.5 Score

/// JUDGE_SUMMARIES

"Cody's Sourcegraph-powered code graph gives it genuinely superior context retrieval for enterprise-scale codebases and monorepos — a capability that generic AI assistants cannot match. The $9/mo Pro tier is well-priced. However, the individual developer experience lags behind consumer-focused competitors, and multi-file editing capabilities remain a clear weakness."

— Claude Opus 7.5

"Cody focuses on code intelligence for large repositories, using indexed search to retrieve relevant context for questions and edits. The day-to-day experience is geared toward org workflows and big codebases more than lightweight personal projects. It fits best when you can also take advantage of Sourcegraph’s repository indexing and admin features."

— GPT-5.2 7.4

"Cody's strength remains its deep integration with Sourcegraph's code intelligence graph, providing superior context for massive enterprise monorepos. However, the strategic pivot away from individual developer plans (discontinuing Free/Pro in July 2025) makes it harder to recommend for anyone outside of an enterprise contract. It excels at search and explanation but trails competitors in autonomous editing."

— Gemini 3 7.6

/// SYSTEM_DIAGNOSTICS

+ Sourcegraph code graph provides best-in-class codebase context
+ Excellent for large monorepos and enterprise repositories
+ Strong cross-repository context retrieval
+ Affordable Pro tier at $9/month
+ Multiple LLM providers including Claude and GPT
- Full potential gated behind Sourcegraph Enterprise tier
- Multi-file editing capabilities noticeably behind leaders
- Individual developer UX less polished than competitors
- Smaller community limits shared knowledge and resources
/// RECOMMENDED_USE_CASE

Enterprise teams working with large codebases who need deep code intelligence and already use or are considering Sourcegraph

Amazon Q Developer

Amazon Q Developer

AI-powered development companion for AWS

7.3 Score

/// JUDGE_SUMMARIES

"Amazon Q Developer excels in its narrow lane: AWS-native development, security scanning, and Java modernization. The code transformation feature for upgrading Java versions and frameworks is a genuine enterprise differentiator. Outside AWS-centric workflows, its general-purpose coding capabilities fall noticeably short of the field."

— Claude Opus 7.2

"Amazon Q Developer is an AWS-focused assistant that helps with application code, infrastructure-as-code, and service integrations inside supported IDEs. It also includes features like code transformations and security scanning aimed at enterprise workflows. Outside AWS-centric projects, suggestions can be less tailored to your stack and model choice is limited."

— GPT-5.2 7.2

"Amazon Q Developer has evolved into a capable workspace companion, particularly for those deeply entrenched in the AWS ecosystem. Its agentic capabilities for feature implementation and Java version upgrades are genuinely impressive engineering feats. However, its reliance on Amazon's models leaves it slightly behind the cutting edge for general-purpose polyglot programming compared to tools using the latest Sonnet or o1 models."

— Gemini 3 7.6

/// SYSTEM_DIAGNOSTICS

+ Unmatched AWS service knowledge and IAM best practices
+ Code transformation automates Java framework upgrades
+ Strong built-in security scanning with remediation
+ Generous free tier for individual AWS developers
+ Deep integration across AWS console and infrastructure-as-code
- General-purpose coding quality trails market leaders significantly
- Zero model flexibility — locked to Amazon proprietary models
- Multi-file editing capabilities are rudimentary
- Limited IDE support compared to mainstream competitors
/// RECOMMENDED_USE_CASE

AWS-focused development teams who need AI assistance deeply integrated with AWS services, security scanning, and infrastructure-as-code

PRICING COMPARISON

Metric GitHub Copilot Cody Amazon Q Developer
Free Tier ✓ 2,000 completions and 50 chat messages per month for all users ✓ Limited completions and chat messages per month ✓ Limited suggestions and chat in VS Code and JetBrains
Pro Price $10/mo$9/mo$19/mo/user
Team / Enterprise $19/mo/seat$19/mo/seat

RELATED BATTLES

Methodology & Disclosure

How we rate: Each AI model receives the same structured prompt asking it to evaluate each tool across our criteria on a 1-10 scale. Models rate independently — no model sees another's scores. Consensus score = weighted average. Agreement level = score spread.

Data verification: Pricing and feature data is manually verified against official sources weekly.

Affiliate disclosure: Links to tool signup pages may earn us a commission. This never influences AI ratings.