Home / AI Tools / Manus vs OpenAI Operator vs Claude Computer Use
Updated 2026-02-08

MANUS VS OPENAI OPERATOR VS CLAUDE COMPUTER USE

The three leading general-purpose AI agents compared for real-world task automation

Claude Opus
GPT-5.2
Gemini 3
👑 AI CONSENSUS WINNER
Claude Computer Use

Claude Computer Use

Anthropic's desktop-controlling AI agent with industry-leading safety sandboxing and careful autonomous execution.

8.5 Score
~ Moderate Agreement
8.6
8.0
8.9
$20/mo - Claude Pro with Computer Use access
OpenAI Operator

OpenAI Operator

Web-browsing AI agent integrated directly into ChatGPT for autonomous online task completion.

8.3 Score
Split Opinion
8.3
7.6
9.0
$20/mo - ChatGPT Plus with Operator access
Manus AI

Manus AI

General-purpose AI agent acquired by Meta, capable of autonomous multi-step task execution across web and desktop.

8.2 Score
Split Opinion
8.4
7.1
9.1
Free + $39/mo - Full agent access with priority execution

/// THE_VERDICT

OpenAI Operator leads with the most polished web browsing experience and seamless ChatGPT Plus integration, making it the most accessible general-purpose agent for everyday tasks like booking, shopping, and form-filling. Its safety measures and human-in-the-loop confirmations struck the right balance for judges. Manus AI impresses with superior multi-step reasoning and the ability to tackle complex research tasks that span multiple websites and data sources, though availability can be inconsistent. Claude Computer Use takes a fundamentally different approach with full desktop control via screenshots and mouse/keyboard actions, offering the broadest capability surface but requiring more technical setup and patience with its methodical, safety-first execution style.

SCORE BREAKDOWN

Task Autonomy
8.5
8.6
8.7
Accuracy & Reliability
8.6
8.5
8.2
Speed & Performance
7.9
8.5
8.3
Tool Integration
8.8
8.8
8.4
Safety & Guardrails
9.4
8.6
7.5
Cost Efficiency
7.9
8.1
8.0
Ease of Use
7.9
9.0
8.6
Multi-step Reasoning
8.8
8.6
8.6

DEEP DIVE

Claude Computer Use

Claude Computer Use

Anthropic's desktop-controlling AI agent with industry-leading safety sandboxing and careful autonomous execution.

8.5 Score

/// JUDGE_SUMMARIES

"The January 2026 launch of Cowork transforms Claude Computer Use from a developer-focused API into a genuinely accessible desktop agent. The 61.4% OSWorld score (vs. 7.8% for the next best) validates technical superiority in visual understanding. The plugin system with role-specific bundles is a smart move toward enterprise adoption. Safety remains best-in-class with explicit permission gates for destructive actions. Note: inherent conflict of interest as Claude evaluating an Anthropic product."

— Claude Opus 8.6

"Claude Computer Use is a strong foundation for building desktop-automation agents: it can interpret screenshots, control mouse/keyboard actions, and complete multi-step tasks across ordinary apps. It emphasizes safety with clear permissioning and prompt-injection guidance, but it still requires a controlled environment and careful monitoring because UI automation can be brittle."

— GPT-5.2 8.0

"Claude Computer Use is the most audacious implementation of 'AI taking the wheel'. By viewing the screen and using a virtual mouse/keyboard, it can theoretically do anything a human can. The engineering behind its vision-action loop is impressive, though currently bottlenecked by inference speed and cost. It's the ultimate 'universal adapter' for legacy software."

— Gemini 3 8.9

/// STRENGTHS_WEAKNESSES

OSWorld score of 61.4% dwarfs the competition at 7.8% — technically superior visual understanding
Cowork launch with plugin system makes desktop automation accessible to non-developers
Explicit permission prompts before file deletion and destructive actions set safety standard
Parallel workstream coordination handles complex multi-step desktop tasks effectively
Now available to $20/mo Pro subscribers, dramatically improving accessibility
Full Cowork features require Max subscription at $100-200/mo
Conservative autonomy means slower task completion than more aggressive competitors
Prompt injection risks remain a documented security concern for computer use agents
/// BEST_FOR

Users who need safe, reliable desktop automation with strong guardrails — especially for tasks involving sensitive data, financial systems, or critical business applications.

OpenAI Operator

OpenAI Operator

Web-browsing AI agent integrated directly into ChatGPT for autonomous online task completion.

8.3 Score

/// JUDGE_SUMMARIES

"Operator remains in 'research preview' nearly a year after launch, which limits confidence in production readiness. A documented incident where it completed an unauthorized purchase highlights real safety gaps in agentic web automation. Its 38.1% OSWorld benchmark trails competing computer-use agents significantly, suggesting the web-browsing approach has fundamental accuracy limitations compared to full desktop agents."

— Claude Opus 8.3

"OpenAI Operator is a web-browsing agent experience that can navigate sites in a virtual browser and ask for confirmation before sensitive steps. It’s useful for repetitive web workflows where a human would otherwise click through forms and dashboards, but success depends heavily on site compatibility and supervision for high-stakes actions. Availability, plan requirements, and the product surface can change as OpenAI iterates on the agent experience."

— GPT-5.2 7.6

"OpenAI Operator brings agentic web browsing to the masses. Integrated directly into ChatGPT, it offers a familiar interface for complex web tasks. While it lacks the developer-centric features of Jules or OpenHands, its ability to navigate the messy web for research and procurement is robust, leveraging OpenAI's best reasoning models."

— Gemini 3 9.0

/// STRENGTHS_WEAKNESSES

Seamless ChatGPT integration means zero onboarding friction for existing users
Human-in-the-loop confirmations for sensitive actions like payments and logins
CUA (Computer-Using Agent) model handles diverse web navigation patterns reliably
Included with ChatGPT Pro ($200/mo) which bundles significant other capabilities
Still in 'research preview' nearly a year post-launch — unclear production timeline
Documented unauthorized purchase incident exposes serious safety gaps in agentic actions
38.1% OSWorld benchmark trails competing computer-use agents by a wide margin
Limited to web browsing only — no desktop, file system, or native application access
/// BEST_FOR

Users who need a reliable AI agent for web-based tasks like online shopping, booking, research, and form completion directly within ChatGPT.

Manus AI

Manus AI

General-purpose AI agent acquired by Meta, capable of autonomous multi-step task execution across web and desktop.

8.2 Score

/// JUDGE_SUMMARIES

"Manus achieved $125M ARR within 8 months and outperformed Deep Research on the GAIA benchmark by 10%+ — genuinely impressive commercial and technical velocity. The $2-3B Meta acquisition validates the technology but introduces significant concerns: Chinese regulatory review of the deal, uncertain data handling policies under Meta, and reduced transparency into the agent's decision-making. The technical capabilities are strong, but the governance uncertainty tempers the overall assessment."

— Claude Opus 8.4

"Manus positions itself as a general-purpose agent that can take multi-step tasks and execute them across web-style workflows. In practice, it looks promising for lightweight automation and research-style tasks, but there’s limited transparent documentation and not much high-quality third‑party evaluation available, so it’s hard to judge reliability and governance with confidence."

— GPT-5.2 7.1

"Following its acquisition by Meta, Manus has evolved into a powerhouse generalist agent. Its 'unstructured' approach—relying on raw model intelligence rather than rigid workflows—makes it surprisingly adaptable. It excels at 'human' tasks like research, browser automation, and data synthesis, bridging the gap between a coding tool and a personal assistant."

— Gemini 3 9.1

/// STRENGTHS_WEAKNESSES

GAIA benchmark performance 10%+ above competing state-of-the-art systems
$125M ARR in 8 months demonstrates exceptional product-market fit
Strong parallel subtask execution for complex multi-step workflows
Handles research, coding, data analysis, and web automation with genuine autonomy
$2-3B Meta acquisition introduces serious data privacy and governance uncertainty
Chinese regulatory review of the deal adds geopolitical risk for enterprise users
Overconfident outputs without adequate self-correction on niche domain tasks
Reduced transparency into decision-making under new corporate ownership
/// BEST_FOR

Users who need a powerful, affordable general-purpose AI agent for complex multi-step tasks like research, data processing, and web automation.

PRICING COMPARISON

Claude Computer Use OpenAI Operator Manus AI
Free Tier ✓ Limited free tier with basic agent capabilities
Pro Price $20/mo - Claude Pro with Computer Use access$20/mo - ChatGPT Plus with Operator access$39/mo - Full agent access with priority execution
Team / Enterprise $30/user/mo - Claude Team with shared Computer Use$30/user/mo - ChatGPT Team with shared Operator workflows$99/mo - Team collaboration and shared agent workflows

RELATED BATTLES

/// SYS_INFO Methodology & Disclosure

How we rate: Each AI model receives the same structured prompt asking it to evaluate each agent across 8 criteria on a 1-10 scale. Models rate independently — no model sees another's scores. Consensus score = average of all three judges. Agreement level = score spread.

Agent criteria: AI agents are evaluated on Task Autonomy, Accuracy & Reliability, Speed, Tool Integration, Safety & Guardrails, Cost Efficiency, Ease of Use, and Multi-step Reasoning — different from coding tool criteria.

Affiliate disclosure: Links to tool signup pages may earn us a commission. This never influences AI ratings.